![]() Biniadrís, together with the caves of Mussol, Cárritx and Pas, is distinguished for the impressive conservation and very particular funerary rituals discovered within them. Around one hundred of cavities have been discovered, including the cave of Biniadrís, located on the side of a gorge around 2km far from the coastline. Here, several excavations and research work have been carried out since the decade of 1960s. An extraordinary example is the funerary landscape of Calescoves, located within the municipality of Alaior. ![]() Of special note are the caves that witnesses social and symbolic rituals within their walls around 3400 years ago. Hundreds of caves feature in the natural landscape of the island of Menorca (Spain). But how about the pain of the people tormented by diseases? If animal testing helps saving human lives then there is no reason to stop it.įor what reason does Martha argue that animal testing should be banned?The cave of Biniadris (Menorca, Spain) and the worked osseous assemblages from the Bronze Age funerary record in the Balearic Islands What is wrong with that? Human right is above animal right. So what? Animals are also killed to be consumed by human. Animals are killed in order to make drugs for human. The fact is we should and we must put our own benefit over other species. Pro also stated that animal testing is barbaric. Does it mean the first test is useless? Obviously not. So 92% of the drugs which pass the first test fail the second test. 900 fail the first test and only 100 are allowed to take the second test, then 92 fail and only 8 pass. Let's imagine something like this: 1000 drugs need to go through two tests. ![]() Those that pass the test are not automatically safe but they are less likely to be dangerous than the ones that were discarded thanks to the test. We use animal testing to find the drugs potentially dangerous to human. This is very misleading and it doesn't prove anything. ![]() Pro claimed that "92 percent of experimental drugs which are safe and effective in animals fail in human clinical trials because they are too dangerous or don't work". Pro has presented two reasons why we should ban animal testing, I will refute them one by one. Most of these experiments aren't used with any sort of painkiller. Testing is often painful, and includes many sickening ways of completing experiments, like pouring drain killer into the eyes of animals, or rubbing chemicals on shaved skin. Also, cures for many diseases and medical conditions like stroke and asthma, have made little progress over the past century, yet have used excessive animal testing in experiments. Innocent animals are dying, and 9 in 10 animals die for a product that doesn't even work. Approximately 19.5% are killed every year in research. Animals' lives are treated like dirt, and while they can't talk, they still have rights. Secondly, it is a barbaric way of researching. Cosmetics, drugs, and other animal tested products can also cause health problems due to unreliability. Animal testing can even delay research because of its unreliability. This means that the animals died for a cause that didn't even work out. It has been proven that 92 percent of experimental drugs which are safe and effective in animals fail in human clinical trials because they are too dangerous or don’t work. Animals don't have the same body systems as us, and what might be good for them may not have the same great effect on us. Animal testing is certainly a disgrace, and this house believes that it should be banned.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |